Architekwiki
  • Home
  • WIKI
  • Start Here
  • Resources
  • Other
    • Reading List
    • Ochre >
      • Ochre
      • Ochre KB
      • Ochre FAQs
      • Ochre Help
    • Details
    • The 3 Aspects
    • About
    • Subscription FAQs
    • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • WIKI
  • Start Here
  • Resources
  • Other
    • Reading List
    • Ochre >
      • Ochre
      • Ochre KB
      • Ochre FAQs
      • Ochre Help
    • Details
    • The 3 Aspects
    • About
    • Subscription FAQs
    • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe

Architekwiki

A Resource For Architects
Click here to get good stuff in your inbox

Categories

All
Business Development
Business Management
Design
Detail
Miscellaneous
Project Management
Resources

Archives

January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012

Architectural Bookkeeping App Evaluation

5/2/2021

 
Architectural Bookkeeping Evaluation
Most small firm architects are unhappy with their bookkeeping application. This is an evaluation of what is available.

Architectural Bookkeeping App Evaluation

Introduction

What do small-firm architects need from their bookkeeping system?

I am concentrating on small-firm architects because 90% of all US architectural firms have less than 20 people. Firms of less than 20 people cannot afford to use an accounting system because managing an accounting system requires a part-time staff person. The cost of the software isn’t prohibitive, it is the large addition to overhead expenses that is the main problem with accounting. The secondary problem is that accounting creates a lot of historical data that no one has time to make use of. So accounting is a waste of resources. 

The solution is to use a bookkeeping system. Bookkeeping is a part of accounting. It is the data entry part. Small-firm architects need a way to capture money transactions. The main type of transaction is timesheet entries. The cost of time is always the major expense for an architect. Your bookkeeping system should collect this data for you and make it available instantly is a way that allows you to manage your time wisely. It should not be a surprise that poorly managed time leads to poorly performing financial results.

Bookkeeping can tell you how your project budgets are doing, it may also help you record your fees, invoices, your business expenses, reimbursable expenses. 

Find a service like Gusto to prepare payroll. Use an accountant to prepare tax returns and the occasional financial statement. This approach is far less expensive and disruptive. When you consider what you should be using your time for, billable project work, business development, it is a bargain. Accounting is near the bottom of all the things you should spend your limited time on. 
Click here to go straight to Results

Architectural Bookkeeping  -  Timekeeping 

When you think of bookkeeping, you may not be aware of the role of timekeeping integrated. However, I think timekeeping is the most important aspect of bookkeeping because it represents management of your largest resource and your biggest expense. 

The two most obvious uses for timekeeping are to know how much to pay your staff and to know how much to bill your clients. However, the most valuable use for timekeeping is to know how each project is doing compared to its budget. With this information you can make decisions early to avoid overspending or to avoid missing a deadline. Collecting time daily and seeing the results immediately is correspondingly important. 

If you are billing by the hour, you want to have an accurate report on how much to bill. And if you are billing with a fixed fee, you cannot afford to spend unlimited time for a fixed amount of income.

It is also desirable to know that you are on target to be able to bill more than your typical monthly expenses. Another important issue is knowing what percentage of everyone’s time is billable. Most firms will find it impossible to be profitable if the percent of billable time isn’t consistently over 65%. 


You can find out what your percentage billable should be with this link.

​
Timekeeping features to look for
  • Project-based timekeeping
  • Ability to set budgets and see status
  • Ability to see the effects of time entries as soon as made 
  • Payroll reporting - doing payroll in-house is never a good idea for small firms
  • Invoice reporting - Architects’ invoicing is so unique that incorporating actual invoice preparation into the application is often not helpful, but you will need the information that the invoice will contain. 
  • Reporting on the individual and overall billable percentage ('utilization rate' in accountant-speak).
​

Architectural Project Bookkeeping 

The vast majority of small firm architects do not know how individual projects are performing financially. It is very time consuming to evaluate project performance if your bookkeeping application does not do it for you. At the very minimum you need to know how many of your budgeted hours have been spent. Even better is to know how much of your fee has been spent because not all hours have the same cost. Optimally you would also know how project expenses are working out compared to your proposal’s assumptions. 

If you don’t know how individual projects perform economically, you may be doomed to repeating mistakes that would otherwise be obvious. In my experience these mistakes always cost you money. 

The extra effort required to input project information is tiny - an hour or two per project in total. The feedback is close to priceless. 
​
It is very important to use a project-based application. 
​

Architectural ​Fees

Tracking fees is a necessity if only for sending invoices. It ought to be part of your bookkeeping app so that you don’t have to maintain two applications. 
​
Ideally you would track your fees by phase of work or service. You will want to determine the net fee after deducting consultants and other expenses so that you can set a budget. 
​

Invoicing

Very few applications offer all the forms of invoices that architects use. Even those that offer what you need are often flawed in some aesthetic way. 

Having an application that prepares invoices that are acceptable is helpful, but by no means crucial. However, getting invoicing information out of the app is crucial. Nevertheless, if your bookkeeping app can create invoices for you, then your time-savings can be significant. 

Invoicing features to look for
  • Hourly rate summaries with values
  • Percent complete per phase
  • Reimbursable Expenses and Mileage 
  • Project Expenses
​

Architectural Expenses

Having all expenses in one place, whether project or business related is nice to have. Project related expenses are very important. Business expenses less so. You can log and track business expenses with a fairly simple spreadsheet. 

With expenses comes categories to put those expenses in. For small firms categories are a distraction. You can get the same information by sorting your expenses by payee to see where the money went. Elaborate account numbers are a time waster because it removes you another degree from your data. I think account numbers are a throwback to early computer systems that could only deal with numbers. 

If it is possible to have it all in one place, this will be a real time-saver.
​

Other Issues

​Besides the five main bookkeeping issues above, there are several other secondary issues that you need to think about. Are any of these issues important to you?
  • Overtime / Comp Time management 
  • Mileage tracking
  • Reimbursable Expenses tracking
  • Billable Ratio (Percent Billable)
  • Paid Time Off tracking 
  • Payroll report preparation 
  • Invoice-able value report preparation
  • Custom Billing Rates per project 
  • Accounts payable report
  • Receivables report

​Almost certainly one or more of these issues are valuable to you and would be a benefit if it is part of any system you adopt. However most likely none of these issues are critical to you and can be managed with spreadsheets where desirable. It is just that management by spreadsheet is usually time-consuming. 

 

​Architectural Bookkeeping App Evaluation


The Final Report
If you want to dig a bit deeper into my recommendations, the Final Report is free. Use the form below.
The Final Report contains:
  • The Detailed Recommendations
  • The Comparison Table in PDF and Excel
  • All of my Scored Evaluation Forms
  • A blank form so you can do the scoring

Evaluation Criteria

After considering all the ideas above, I digested the criteria down to a manageable list. Then I added ‘weight’ to the criteria and arranged the criteria accordingly.
​
Below is an example of the the evaluation sheet that I created.
App Evaluation Form

The Candidates

After several searches over a week or so I came up with my list of candidates. There were 44 apps considered over all. Six of them were ruled out because they no longer existed, or they were inappropriate in some way.

​Next I did a cursory review of the 38 remaining to see if they met the basic criteria. I found that 29 did and I dug into to those more deeply by scoring them on the evaluation form.

This is the list of 44 that I started with.
5PM 
Accounting ASAP
actiTIME 
Airtable
Ajera by Deltek 
Avaza 
BeeBole 
Big 4 Books
BigTime 
BQE Core
Clockify 
coda.io
Dovico 
FreeAgent
Freedcamp 

FreshBooks 
Freshprojects 
FunctionFox 
Harvest 
Hubstaff 
Kashoo
Lessaccounting 
Mavenlink 
Monday.com 
Monograph
Paymo
ProjectManager
ProofHub 
PulseApp
TSheets (QuickBooks)

Ravetree
Smartsheet
Squava
Teamwork 
Timecamp
TimeSolv Pro 
Toggl 
Trigger 
TSheets / QB Time 
VeriClock 
Wave
Working Point
Wrike 
​Xero

The Comparison Table

Picture
After scoring the apps, I transcribed the results into a table for easier reference and to get total scores calculated. 

The Final Report
If you want to dig a bit deeper into my recommendations, the Final Report is free. Use the form below.
The Final Report contains:
  • The Detailed Recommendations
  • The Comparison Table in PDF and Excel
  • All of my Scored Evaluation Forms
  • A blank form so you can do the scoring

The Recommendations

BIGTIME
My first choice is BIGTIME. The BIGTIME app has everything that a small-firm architect needs and it works great for architects. I wasn’t looking for an invoicing system as part of the app, but BIGTIME has a perfect invoicing system. I cannot think of a type of invoice that you can’t prepare with BIGTIME. In fact the invoicing system makes up for BIGTIME’s one shortcoming for the very small firm (under 5) - the cost. At $30/user/mo it does not seem too bad but the minimum number of users is five. So a two person firm must spend an extra $150 per mo. However BIGTIME’s invoicing system will save you several hours every month. This means more billable time or better quality of life. So I think the cost is justifiable for the perfect solution. Link to BIGTIME website: https://www.bigtime.net​​


Monograph
Monograph is my second choice and it addresses everything I was looking for quite well with one exception - mileage. You have to enter the dollars rather than the miles. This would be a problem for me. There are thousands of dollars involved and I would use Expensify or similar to address the issue that Monograph has ignored so far. This means more effort for everyone. Actually the entire area of expenses seems a bit weak. Including how expenses affect your overhead factor. Monograph looks a little nicer than BIGTIME but the data isn’t very helpful in some cases. Monograph is $45/user/mo with no minimum number of users. Link to Monograph website: https://monograph.io​​


Harvest
Harvest isn’t really a recommendation; it is more of a special mention. I used Harvest for a while as my firm was winding down. The day to day timekeeping and expense collection is quite good. Many of the reports are useful. The main issue that you struggle with is that Harvest isn’t set up for Project Phases. It is Task-based. So Tasks become your Phases. Invoicing is okay. Hourly invoices work fine. Fixed fee invoices are a bit clumsy with no percent complete. Projects are either all fixed fee or all hourly billing. I think that most firms would need more flexibility. For a long range solution that you can use as you grow, I think Harvest comes up short compared to BIGTIME or Monograph. Link to Harvest website: https://www.getharvest.com​​


Avaza
Avaza is an oddity. It ranks number one but I don’t feel comfortable recommending it. It is very inexpensive, and it does most things quite well. The downside is that you have to work pretty hard at understanding Avaza’s way of looking at projects so there is a significant DIY aspect to using Avaza. It’s one real annoying feature is how it copies over your last timesheet with all the hours included. So it doesn’t save any time since you have to immediately delete all the past entries. Invoicing is amazingly robust, perhaps equal to Monograph. Avaza is very customizable, only second to BIGTIME in that regard. If you have a clear idea of how you want to manage your project budgets and you are not put off by the DIY aspect, Avaza may work for you. Link to Avaza website: https://www.avaza.com​​


You may have noticed
 that I have overlooked several high-scoring apps. BQE Core is simply overkill for a small firm. You will waste a lot of time managing BQE Core itself. Squava, Ajera, and Xero are all accounting packages and the same thing applies to them as BQE Core.
​

I encourage you to use my evaluation as a jumping off point for your own search for the right bookkeeping system. 

Comments are closed.
    Resources

    Start Here

    YouTube Channel

    Join The Mailing List

    Terms of Use
    Your use of Architekwiki is implicit agreement with the 
    ​
    Terms of Use.
    Thank You for your donation

    x
    Get Good Stuff in Your Inbox
    Picture
    Subscribe

    RSS Feed


    Archives

    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012

    Categories

    All
    Business Development
    Business Management
    Design
    Detail
    Miscellaneous
    Project Management
    Resources

Picture

Picture
VISIT ARCHITEKWIKI'S RESOURCES
​
START HERE
ABOUT
SIGN UP
TERMS OF USE
Architekwiki | Architect's Resource | Greater Cincinnati 
© 2012-2022   Architekwiki​