Architekwiki
  • Home
  • WIKI
  • Start Here
  • Resources
  • Other
    • Reading List
    • Ochre >
      • Ochre
      • Ochre KB
      • Ochre FAQs
      • Ochre Help
    • Details
    • The 3 Aspects
    • About
    • Subscription FAQs
    • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • WIKI
  • Start Here
  • Resources
  • Other
    • Reading List
    • Ochre >
      • Ochre
      • Ochre KB
      • Ochre FAQs
      • Ochre Help
    • Details
    • The 3 Aspects
    • About
    • Subscription FAQs
    • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe

Architekwiki

A Resource For Architects
Click here to get good stuff in your inbox

Small Firm Accounting - Part 6 - Software Comparison

3/25/2013

 
This post is 8 years old, might be time to revisit this research.

​.

Finances
When you start to get frustrated with your simple home made bookkeeping system, check out this bookkeeping services comparison. I have used two of them, Cobalt and B2Bee, and experimented with trials on several others. In the chart below I have listed key criteria and what I could determine about how each service meets the criteria. 

All of the services are internet-based. No software to install and update. Most of the services have more than one plan. For comparison the least expensive plan that allowed unlimited clients was selected for comparison. A general problem with these bookkeeping services is that the content/layout of the invoice is pretty static. You can customize the look but not the fundamental way the invoice works. None have a layout that supports a fee as a percentage of construction cost. You can 'trick' some layouts into showing phases and decimal quantities with unit cost equal to the value of the phase's fee, but you are on your own and may as well be using a spreadsheet invoice. 

Here is the list of services and a brief statement about each of them. Bear in mind that I am an architect and not an accountant, and this is pretty subjective.
  • LessAccounting -  Overall a pretty nice solution. As usual certain types of invoicing will be quirky to get it to represent your agreement, but better than most. They bill themselves as the antidote to Quickbooks.
  • QuickBooks Online -  This is an accounting package, not just bookkeeping. It can do a lot and will take a lot of time for you to get it set up and to keep up with it. For example you can add payroll to the service.
  • Accounting ASAP -  Without any project recognition, it is almost too simple. You will need to keep part of your home made simple system.
  • Big 4 -  The lack of time entry and integration with another time entry application means you will need parts of your simple system.
  • Cobalt -  I've used Cobalt and it does a descent job except for invoicing and time entry. So we had to do those things with the simple system I described in Part 3. 
  • IAC-EZ -  Invoicing is pretty inflexible and no time entry.
  • Pulse -  I really like this service because it tracks cash flow. The downside is that it only tracks cash flow. You will need another system for invoicing and time entry.
  • Wave -  This is a very nice service and it is FREE. Unfortunately it doesn't do time entry or projects. Invoicing looks workable with a bit of tweaking. Maybe combine this with Pulse...
  • Working Point -  This is a pretty nice service - if only it could deal with projects. 
  • Xero -  This is very similar to QuickBooks Online.
  • FreshBooks -  This is a very popular service and has been around for a while - long enough that the options in invoicing have gotten more flexible. This is a pretty good choice.
  • Kashoo -  This service doesn't have robust invoicing, time entry or projects. If you are selling widgets, it is great.
  • FreeAgent -  If you only bill by the hour, this will work very nicely. Or you could send home made invoices to supplement the lack of flexibility.
  • B2Bee -  We are using this service now. The only three things we do outside the service is accounts payable, assigning a share of general office expenses to each project, and breaking down payroll per project. These last two are only needed for projects with lump sum or percentage fees.


Nearly all of these services has some sort of limited free version or a trial version that allows you to try it out before having to commit. Even- after signing up, the majority allow cancellation at any time.  
The table below is downloadable as a PDF which has hyperlinks to the services compared.

Comparison
Here are links to the other Parts:
Part 1 - Invoicing
Part 2 - Paying Bills
Part 3 - A Simple System
Part 4 - Other Accounting Issues
Part 5 - Software Criteria
Part 6 - Software Comparison


Comments are closed.
    Resources

    Start Here

    YouTube Channel

    Join The Mailing List

    Picture

    Terms of Use
    Your use of Architekwiki is implicit agreement with the 
    ​
    Terms of Use.
    Thank You for your donation

    x
    Get Good Stuff in Your Inbox
    Picture
    Subscribe

    RSS Feed


    Archives

    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012

    Categories

    All
    Business Development
    Business Management
    Design
    Detail
    Miscellaneous
    Project Management
    Resources

Picture

Picture
VISIT ARCHITEKWIKI'S RESOURCES
​
START HERE
ABOUT
SIGN UP
TERMS OF USE
Architekwiki | Architect's Resource | Greater Cincinnati 
© 2012-2022   Architekwiki​